石棉县草科乡倪厂沟“8·14”泥石流动力学演化过程分析
作者:
作者单位:

1.成都理工大学, 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室, 四川 成都 610059 ;2.四川省华地建设工程有限责任公司, 四川 成都 610036

作者简介:

夏喆(2000-),硕士研究生,主要从事遥感及地质灾害风险防治研究。E-mail:100338783@qq.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(42477173);四川省自然科学基金(2024NSFSC0071);四川省中央引导地方科技发展专项(自由探索类基础研究)(2024ZYD0121)


Dynamic evolution of “8·14” debris flow in Nichang Gully,Caoke Township, Shimian County
Author:
Affiliation:

1.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection,Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059 , Sichuan, China ;2.Sichuan Huadi Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610036 , Sichuan, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    在2022年“9·5”泸定地震后,震区内一系列同震滑坡、崩塌广泛堆积形成了松散固体物质,在强降雨的作用下,极大地提高了震后山区泥石流暴发的可能性。2022年9月20日,石棉县草科乡倪厂沟流域发生了10年一遇的强降雨,导致泥石流暴发,泥石流物质冲出沟口并堆积在河道内,致使河道堵塞。2023年8月14日,倪厂沟泥石流再度暴发,致使下游新建拦砂坝於满。选择倪厂沟流域为工作区,剖析该地区泥石流致灾条件。基于FLO-2D软件,模拟倪厂沟在有防治工程与无防治工程条件下,降雨频率为10%时泥石流的演化过程分析;通过Ω评估系数法,利用倪厂沟“9·20”泥石流以验证模型精度。结果表明,此种模拟方法下的倪厂沟泥石流动力演进过程模拟精度评估系数Ω为1.59,说明该模型具有一定的可信度;并分别开展倪厂沟在5%、2%以及1%三种降雨频率下的泥石流冲出预测研究;同时,设置在有防治工程的条件下,降雨频率为10%时泥石流模拟结果与倪厂沟“8·14”泥石流实际运动结果相耦合,初步判断倪厂沟“8·14”泥石流的暴发频率为10年一遇。此外,通过模拟倪厂沟流域分别在2%与1%这两种降雨频率下所暴发的泥石流,发现其皆导致了拦砂坝防治效应失效,泥石流物质冲出沟口导致河道堵塞,且伴随着降雨频率从5%到1%的变化,泥石流所威胁的范围也逐渐增加。

    Abstract:

    After the “9·5” Luding earthquake in 2022, a series of coseismic landslides and collapses occurred in the earthquake area, leading to the extensive accumulation and formation of loose solid debris. Under the action of heavy rainfall, the possibility of debris flow outbreak in the mountainous areas after the earthquake was greatly improved. On September 20, 2022, a once-in-a-decade heavy rainfall occurred in Nichang Gully, Caoke Township, Shimian County, resulting in a debris flow outbreak. During this event, massive amounts of debris flow rushed out of the gully and accumulated in the river, causing the river to be blocked. On August 14, 2023, another debris flow broke out in Nichang Gully again, leading to the silting-up of a new check dam downstream. In this study, FLO-2D was used to analyze the dynamic evolution processes of the Nichang Gully debris flow with and without a dam when the rainfall frequency reached 10%. Furthermore, the model accuracy was verified using the method of evaluation coefficient Ω . The results indicate that the modulus evaluation coefficient Ω of the dynamic evolution of Nichang Gully debris flow using this simulation method is 1.59, indicating the model's reliability. Meanwhile, the prediction of debris flow under three rainfall frequencies of 5%, 2%, and 1% was carried out. The simulation results of debris flow with prevention and control engineering under a rainfall frequency of 10% were coupled with the actual movement results of the “8·14” debris flow in Nichang Gully. The results indicate a preliminary judgment wherein the outbreak frequency of the “8·14” debris flow is once every 10 years. At the same time, the simulation results of debris flows under rainfall frequencies of 2% and 1% indicate that both lead to the failure of the control effect of the check dam. As the debris flow materials rush out of the gully, this incident causes the blockage of the river. With the change in rainfall frequency from 5% to 1%, the scope of debris flow threat also increases gradually. Overall, the threat of debris flow in Nichang Gully can be effectively reduced by adding retaining measures for the debris flow, building and maintaining the drainage channel project, and inspecting and dredging the check dam before the start of the rainy season each year.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏喆,常鸣,张远明,等.石棉县草科乡倪厂沟“8·14”泥石流动力学演化过程分析[J].地震工程学报,2025,47(2):404-414. DOI:10.20000/j.1000-0844.20230905001

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-20