文章摘要
傅磊,李小军,陈苏.基于经验参考场地的广义线性反演方法[J].地震工程学报,2019,41(5):1290-1298. FU Lei,LI Xiaojun,CHEN Su.A Generalized Inversion Technique Based on the Empirical Reference Site[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2019,41(5):1290-1298.
基于经验参考场地的广义线性反演方法
A Generalized Inversion Technique Based on the Empirical Reference Site
投稿时间:2019-08-31  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0844.2019.05.1290
中文关键词: 局部场地响应;品质因子;应力降;广义线性反演法;汶川地震
英文关键词: local site responses;quality factor;stress drop;the generalized inversion technique;Wenchuan earthquake
基金项目:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(DQJB19B019);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1500400);国家自然基金项目(51708517)
作者单位E-mail
傅磊 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081  
李小军 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081
北京工业大学 建筑工程学院, 北京 100124 
beerli@vip.sina.com 
陈苏 中国地震局地球物理研究所, 北京 100081  
摘要点击次数: 46
全文下载次数: 43
中文摘要:
      为了克服广义线性反演方法(GIT)中理想的参考场地难以找到的局限性,本文将四分之一波长法计算的平均场地放大系数和谱衰减法计算的高频衰减参数作为GIT方法的经验参考场地(ERS)。以2008年5月至8月间28个强震动台站记录的95个汶川8.0级地震余震的615组强震动记录为例,通过与其他方法的比较,验证了ERS-GIT的合理性,并讨论了各类方法之间差异的原因。结果显示,ERS-GIT方法、传统GIT方法和非参数化GIT方法计算得到的平均应力降依次为1.15 MPa,0.78 MPa和0.52 MPa;ERS-GIT方法和传统GIT方法得到的品质因子分别为Qf)=75.02f1.27Qf)=65.56f1.22。以场地的卓越频率为分界,ERS-GIT方法得到的局部场地响应在长周期和高频部分分别与H/V谱比法和传统GIT方法更为接近。
英文摘要:
      Ideal reference sites of the generalized inversion technique (GIT) are not always available. To overcome this limitation, in this article, average site amplification factor, calculated by the quarter wave-length method, and the high-frequency attenuation parameter, obtained from the spectral decay method, were adopted as the empirical reference site (ERS) of the GIT. Rationality of ERS-GIT was verified, through comparison with other methods, based on 615 groups of strong ground motion records of 95 aftershocks of the 2008 Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake, recorded by 28 strong motion stations during May and August 2008. Reasons for the differences among the various methods are discussed. Results showed that the average stress drop, as calculated by the ERS-GIT, classical GIT method, and nonparametric GIT method was 1.15 MPa, 0.78 MPa, and 0.52 MPa, respectively. Quality factors obtained from the results of the ERS-GIT and classical GIT methods were Q(f)=75.02f1.27 and Q(f)=65.56f1.22, respectively. Taking the predominant frequency of the site as a boundary, the local site responses calculated by the ERS-GIT coincided with those of the H/V spectral ratio method and classical GIT method at long period and high frequency, respectively.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

您是第2377214位访问者
版权所有欢迎《地震工程学报》编辑部
主管单位:中国地震局 主办单位:中国地震局兰州地震研究所
清华大学
中国地震学会
中国土木工程学会
地  址: 甘肃省兰州市东岗西路450号 邮编:730000 电话:0931-8275892 E-mail: dzgcxb@gsdzj.gov.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计